Quick background: I’ll be applying for PhD programs and most likely want to study theoretical condensed matter (though I’m open to other theoretical and mathematical fields). I find experimental physics alright, but it really doesn’t excite me.
I’ve heard that I should apply as if I’m pursuing an experimental physics track, though, because it’s less competitive, and then transition towards a theory group once admitted. Is this sound advice? It came from a rather respected source. Still, I am wary about misrepresenting myself and also concerned about getting stuck in a path that I don’t intend to be in.
Any insight into how admission committees handle the experimental/theory dichotomy would also be appreciated. Thanks.
Additional Info: I’m applying within the US as a citizen. I’m finishing a MS in physics at the moment.
Invitation as a reviewer. Argument: Mycobacterium tuberculosis escape.
I have sent my paper to a Journal. However, until now, they haven’t found enough reviewers. I’m actually looking some reviewers in order to suggest to the journal experts in that field.
Article type: Letter to the editor
Please let me know if you will be able to review submission. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you, Kind regards.
I am in the process of preparing various applications for postdoctoral positions in the US, and I need advice on what is the appropriate way to include contact information on my cover letters and CVs.
Presently, I am an international student studying in Australia. I foresee completing my PhD program (including conferral of the degree) by the end of Jan. 2017. Most of my applications will be lodged through the MathJobs system by early Dec. 2016. My Visa expires at the end of Feb. 2017, and I’m not sure if I can get a visa extension. Meanwhile, my current lease agreement terminates mid-Jan 2016. As you can see, there is a fair amount of uncertainty about my situation next year.
I have always thought that the purpose of writing addresses on any document is not primarily based on the desired affiliation with an institution but so that the recipient of the letter knows whom to reply to. However, and I might be wrong in this, it seems to me that putting your home address in your cover letter and/or CV, as opposed to your current departmental address, is deemed unprofessional. Bear in mind, though, that upon submission of my thesis, I am effectively no longer a student at the university, and hence, I think it somewhat dishonest to use the Maths department address for my mail. By the way, I expect to submit my thesis around mid-October.
So my first question is: Is it considered unprofessional to put my home address as opposed to my institution address on my CVs and cover letters?
My second question is: In light of my situation and the answer to the first question, what is the best way to address my cover letters and CVs?
I understand that I can update my application materials through MathJobs. Thus far, my plan is to use institution addresses (with a c/o Secretary of the Mathematics Department) throughout and then update forwarding addresses through MathJobs as things become more certain. What do you think?
I have been a TA before and I was wondering if you think a TA could get away with advising his whole class to find other arrangements for satisfying their requirement because he is new to teaching/ is not personable (which many remedial students seem to NEED to keep focus given complete lack of interest in academics).
For my graduate studies my supervisor was assigned to me without me having spoken to him first. Now I am wondering if I should introduce myself via e-Mail and then ask for an appointment, or keep it short and ask for an appointment specifically to introduce myself. I don’t want to waste his time or appear rude.
*I am applying to Psychology PhD
For graduate (PhD) applications, most universities ask for a statement of purpose and instructions simply state to discuss your research interests. This type of open-ended prompt suggests to me that they may also be anticipating a rather wide range of research interests from the student. However, for my case, I actually have 2-3 research questions I intend to look at. I have also contacted a professor at the university, to which the professor responded that the questions were interesting and exciting to research. However, since the questions are very specific in nature, they do not correlate very well with many of the other professors’ interests in that department. Only the professor with whom I have been in contact with has those topics listed as their areas of interest.
From a PhD admissions committee perspective, would a student who has clear ideas of what research questions they want to research be viewed positively (i.e. sees the student as being prepared) or negatively (e.g. student’s lack of interests in other professors’ labs), assuming GPA, GRE, etc. are adequate.
I thought about writing my specific questions but also state that I’m open to new ideas, but I was not sure whether that will come off as being snobby or, conversely, desperate.
Any advice from people who have read or written a statement of purpose would be greatly appreciated!
Are pure mathematicians, e.g., Algebraists, Number Theorists, Geometers, and Topologists, at good U.S. research universities expected to win research grants to fund their work, in order to gain tenure and be promoted?
I see a lot of questions here on Academia SE that talk about the need to win grant-funding, in order to survive in academia, but I’m not sure whether that applies to pure math professors.
I am an undergraduate student and while I was taking a class I happened to come up with some new concepts contrary to what my professor had told me regarding their possibility.
I have published in other journals but never in IEEE transactions, this could very well give a solid backing to any SOP I would write for my Phd studies. My professor is a Phd and he has various connections and stuff. He was impressed with the work and told me to publish it. However, I have heard that publishing in IEEE transactions is extremely hard: would including my professor as a co-author, with his doctoral degree, help in the review process? Not influence it or something, but would they at-least take me seriously? Normally, I don’t fret about being published and stuff but to get a good school for Phd it’s essential that I have this done. What are your thoughts?
I am very interested in a particular Phd program that I feel is in line with my professional background. However, I haven’t been in academia for over 18-19 years. I was told by one of the program directors that I would need to have “academic” writing samples and if I didn’t then it would be very difficult to compete for the program.
- How and where could I write?
Kindly let me know.
I am in college working on getting my AS degree is Computer Programming and System Analysis, I am then going to do the extra general education classes and my language credits to get my AA degree, but after I get my AA degree, can I be successful with having a BAS degree in software development or should I attain a BA in Computer Science.
I had heard rumors that people who go to universities have an increased income as opposed to those go to college, however, my main concern is getting into the field and becoming an established individual.
So do I need to go to a university or can I just complete my studies in college?