I have a paper uploaded to arXiv which has a really high view count for papers in my field, I know this is the case because it is also published on Researchgate and I still have about 5-10 reads per week after a year of publishing it.

When it was published, there were a lot of buzz around the paper and we received positive feedback. I don’t have the initial estimate but it could be as high as hundreds of reads.

However, I still have not received a citation on the arXiv paper, and it has been almost a year. I do intend to make modification to the paper later next year based on some new findings, and in the process this would clear up some of the “minor” problems in the original paper, including grammar mistakes.

What could be the reason? Could it be that I uploaded it under the wrong category? My research interest is broad and so is the targeted audience, which may have caused this. I don’t know if it is possible for me to pick a new category.

Is it because of the issues within the paper? I can only know after I have revised the paper, but I suspect this may be one of the issues.

Or is it because it is simply on Arxiv?

Whatever the reason, has anyone else experienced this and was there an resolution (e.g., what did you do that caused other people to cite your work)?

A paper that I need to refer to reasonably often has in its arXiv version the authors listed alphabetically by surname (as is the custom in mathematics). The published version lists the authors in a different order, having moved the last author to second place. The last author in the published version is recently told me he doesn’t understand why people keep insisting on using the published author order (or to put it bluntly: why they keep listing him last).

What would be the correct way to refer to the joint work, given that the arXiv version is no less prominent than the published version? (Other than in the bibliography, where I would stick to the published order) I’m not sure whether it is more accurate to talk about the work/results of ABCD or of ADBC.

I am going to give a course at my company and I’m looking online for images that I can use in my education material.

Since many of the most interesting images suitable for this education exist in papers published on arXiv, how do I know which of the images found in arXiv papers I can use and which I can’t? How do I know how these images are licenced?

I often see images published in arXiv papers that are later used in presentations given by other people and/or republished in other’s research papers, sometimes without any credit given to the creators of the images and almost always without a link to any license (in fact I can’t remember ever seeing such a link, but maybe I have just not paid attention). Under what circumstances is that okay?

A related question is, how does fair use come into all of this since we’re talking about education material?

When a paper is accepted to be published in an IEEE journal, the publishing system sends by email a PDF file of the author’s version
(for an example of what PDF file I’m referring to, see https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1710/1710.01077.pdf).

(1) Is this PDF file the ‘Accepted’ version which can be uploaded to arXiv?

(2) Since in this case the authors do not have the source files of this PDF file, it is OK to bypass arXiv LaTeX detection?

This question already has an answer here:

Around one month ago I changed the name of one paper of mine on ArXiv. I noticed that on google scholar it still appear with the old name and that if I search on google with the new name it does not find anything.

Is there a workaround to fix this problem?

This question already has an answer here:

The core of the problem is already in the title but I feel as i should add some more details.

I was doing some mathematics and, if there are no logical flaws or mistakes of any other nature (it seems that there are none) I managed to prove some result that, again, if it is proved with no errors, would, I believe, enrich the field in which it belongs.

Of course, I immediately started to think about arXiv.org and I decided that I want to submit an article there, but, when I was reading help section, there stands this, written:

Note: It is a violation of our policies to misrepresent your identity or institutional affiliation. Claimed affiliation should be current in the conventional sense: e.g., physical presence, funding, e-mail address, mention on institutional web pages, etc. Misrepresentation of identity or affiliation, for any reason, is possible grounds for immediate and permanent suspension.

But, as you are aware by now, I do not belong to any institution and as such, am not affiliated with any, I am just an amateur that among all fields thinks about mathematics the most. So, I have stumbled upon this cautious note quoted above and do not know what to do.

So, I decided to write to all of you here to see what can be done in this case of mine. I am not 100% sure that among all sites this is the one most suited for this problem of mine (for example, I could have written this on MO Meta or MSE Meta) but surely I will try to welcome opinions and help, even if they do not resolve this issue that I am faced with.

What should be done?

EDIT: This is not a complete duplicate of the question mentioned in such a way as this one is a duplicate of that one because the body of the question mentioned goes like this:

“Assume you have already completed your undergrad and have been working for a number of years. Does one need to be part of a university or a learning institution to publish papers?”

But, I did not complete my undergrad and I am working for a number of years (independently). so, there are some similiarites but the question is not exactly the same, although answers seem to fit well.

How could we correct the missing citation counts and the missing citing References in the adsabs.harvard?

For example, I find that other resources such as https://inspirehep.net/ that have much precise and better citation counts, while both the Google Scholar and adsabs.harvard misses some citation counts/missing citing References.


These three resources have their own advantages and disadvantages:

1) Google Scholar: Google scholar miss citations from arXiv (sometimes but not always).

2) adsabs.harvard: In principle, it counts everything in arXiv, but even if so, the bib format citations may be missing — perhaps it is the LaTex generating issue.

3) https://inspirehep.net, it only counts articles that are relevant to particle physics, high-energy theory, quantum field and string theory. It misses other disciplines such as Atomic-Molecule Optics or Condensed Matter physics.


I am happy to receive comments from experts working in all disciplines.

Here is the scenario, can you give me your idea about 2 things?

A conference paper is published, you submit it to ArXiv. You journalize the paper (with a modified title and added material) and publish it.

A) Should you get a new arXiv link for it?

Let’s assume you get a new arXiv link for it.

B) Can you update the fist ArXiv submission and indicate in the first page, in the footnote, that the complete work has been published in a journal and is available in the second arXiv link?

How could we correct the missing citation counts and the missing citing References in the Google Scholar [suppose you have a Google Scholar profile https://scholar.google.com/]?

For example, I find that other resources such as https://inspirehep.net/ and http://www.adsabs.harvard.edu/ that links to arXiv may have much precise and better citation counts for a few particular publications of mine, while the Google Scholar misses many citation counts/missing citing References.

I am a physicist, an engineer, and a natural scientist. But I don’t mind to receive comments from experts working in other disciplines.

I have submitted one paper with title is “Hello world” (just assume) to arxiv. After that, I change the title to “Hello all the world” by clicking the replace button. I changed the title in this submission. In the website, it appeared as version 2.

However, when I search by google search and google scholar, the title showing in the result is still the old title “Hello world”. What should I do to show the newest title? Thanks